Eatmon v. Pilgrim Pride Chicken Plant et al(INMATE 2), No. 1:2011cv01002 - Document 42 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER re 29 Recommendation. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants Pilgrim's Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. Defendants Pilgrims Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and are hereby DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; and 4. This case with respect to the remaining defendants be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 4/17/2012. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMIE EATMON, AIS #140565, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. PILGRIM S PRIDE CHICKEN PLANT, et al., Defendants. CIV. ACT. NO. 1:11cv1002-TMH (WO) OPINION and ORDER On March 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 29). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The Plaintiff s complaint against Defendants Pilgrim s Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. Defendants Pilgrim s Pride Chicken Plant and Mr. John be and are hereby DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; and 4. This case with respect to the remaining defendants be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Done this the 17th day of April 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
