Barkley v. City of Dothan, et al (INMATE 1), No. 1:2011cv00891 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereb y ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 12/8/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDREW KEITH BARKLEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DOTHAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 1:11cv891-TMH (WO) OPINION and ORDER On November 3, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Done this the 8 th day of December, 2011. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.