McCree v. Blumenfield et al (INMATE1), No. 1:2011cv00850 - Document 7 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to servi ce of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 3. To the extent the complaint presents claims which challenge the constitutionality of a 2008 conviction and sentence imposed upon the plaintiff by the Circuit Court of Ho uston County, Alabama, the complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. 4. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/9/2011. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIE McCREE, #177502, Plaintiff, v. JACK A. BLUMENFIELD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 1:11cv850-TMH (WO) OPINION and ORDER On October 14, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 4). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. The plaintiff s claims against the defendants be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 3. To the extent the complaint presents claims which challenge the constitutionality of a 2008 conviction and sentence imposed upon the plaintiff by the Circuit Court of Houston County, Alabama, the complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time. 4. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Done this the 9 th day of November 2011. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.