Berry v. Bey (INMATE 2), No. 1:2011cv00779 - Document 13 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 12 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is here by ADOPTED and that: (1) Defendant Bey's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 6 ), is GRANTED and this case against him is DISMISSED with prejudice; (2) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendant and against plaintiff; and (3) Costs are TAXED against plaintiff for which execution may issue. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/11/14. (scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION JONATHAN JEROME BERRY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER BEY-BADGE # 840, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv779-WHA ORDER AND OPINION On February 14, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. Defendant Bey s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 6), is GRANTED and this case against him is DISMISSED with prejudice; 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendant and against plaintiff; and 3. Costs are TAXED against plaintiff for which execution may issue. Done this the 11th day of March, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
