-WC Davis v. Andrews et al (INMATE 1), No. 1:2010cv00902 - Document 10 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: It is CONSIDERED, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff Demarlos Davis and Plaintiff take nothing by his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against Plaintiff, for which let execution issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 11/29/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn)

Download PDF
-WC Davis v. Andrews et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DEMARLOS DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MAX ANDREWS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-CV-902-ID (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the court, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff Demarlos Davis and that Plaintiff take nothing by his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against Plaintiff, for which let execution issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this the 29th day of November, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.