Abdullah v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 1:2010cv00815 - Document 8 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the 7 memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the US Mag Judge's 6 Report and Recommendation is adopted; (2) the 28 USC 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus and the motion for equitable tolling are denied; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/25/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
Abdullah v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 8 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION HASAN RASHEED ABDULLAH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv815-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 6) is adopted. (2) The 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) and the motion for equitable tolling (doc. no. 2) are denied. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 25th day of September, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.