Santana v. Cummins et al (INMATE1), No. 1:2010cv00493 - Document 32 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's 30 objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 29 recommendation is adopted; (3) The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is den ied; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/14/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
Santana v. Cummins et al (INMATE1) Doc. 32 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ELIEZER SANTANA, Petitioner, v. JOHN CUMMINS, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv493-TMH (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 30) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 29) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 14th day of April, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.