Farm Credit of Northwest Florida, ACA v. Pittman, No. 1:2010cv00352 - Document 15 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT; that (1) Judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of the plaintiff, Farm Credit of Northwest Florida, ACA, and against the defendant, Windham Todd Pittman, in the amount of $741,113.81 as further set out; (2) Furthermore, judgm ent is also entered in favor of the plaintiff and against thedefendant for attorneys' fees and expenses as further set out; (3) Costs are TAXED in for of the plaintiff and against the defendant for which execution may issue; (4) The Clerk of Cou rt is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to close this file. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/30/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, ) 1/21/2011 Final Pretrial Conference Terminated; 02/14/2011 Non-Jury Trial Terminated:

Download PDF
Farm Credit of Northwest Florida, ACA v. Pittman Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION FARM CREDIT OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA, ACA, Plaintiff, v. WINDHAM TODD PITTMAN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10-cv-352-MEF (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT This action came before the Court for determination on an unopposed motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff. The issues raised in that motion have been heard and a decision has been rendered. For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order on that motion, the Court found that judgment is due to be entered in favor of the plaintiff. Accordingly it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: (1) Judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of the plaintiff, Farm Credit of Northwest Florida, ACA, and against the defendant, Windham Todd Pittman, in the amount of seven hundred forty-one thousand one hundred thirteen dollars and eighty-one cents ($741,113.81), which sum is comprised of seven hundred twenty-eight thousand two hundred seventy-six dollars and nine cents ($728,276.09), plus interest thereon at the rate of one hundred eighty-eight dollars and seventy-nine cents per day ($188.79 per day) from June 23, -1- Dockets.Justia.com 2010. (2) Furthermore, judgment is also entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for attorneys’ fees and expenses in the amount of thirty thousand seven hundred sixteen dollars and six cents ($30,716.06), which sum is comprised of nine thousand six hundred twenty-one dollars and fifty cents ($9,621.50) in attorneys’ fees and four hundred eighty dollars ($480.00) in other recoverable expenses for the work performed by Gardner, Bist, Wiener, Wadsworth & Bowden, P.A. and nineteen thousand four hundred twenty-two dollars ($19,422.00) in attorneys’ fees and one thousand one hundred ninety-two dollars and fifty-six cents ($1,192.56) in other recoverable expenses for the work performed by Walston Wells & Birchall, LLP and Stone Sumblin Law LLC. (3) Costs are TAXED in for of the plaintiff and against the defendant for which execution may issue. (4) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket sheet as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to close this file. th DONE this the 30 day of August, 2010. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.