Hunter v. Easterling et al (INMATE 2), No. 1:2010cv00302 - Document 10 (M.D. Ala. 2010)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff Arthur Lee Hunter and that Plaintiff take nothing by his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against Plaintiff, for which let execution issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 7/27/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hunter v. Easterling et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ARTHUR LEE HUNTER, #199 696, Plaintiff, v. EASTERLING, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-302-ID (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the court, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff Arthur Lee Hunter and that Plaintiff take nothing by his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against Plaintiff, for which let execution issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 27th day of July, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
