Jackson v. Circuit Courts of Houston County et al (INMATE 2), No. 1:2010cv00231 - Document 7 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the Court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court that this case be dismissed with prejudice as to the claims against the defs, and without prejudice as to Plfs ability to challenge the constitutionality of the sentence imposed upon him by the Circuit Court for Houston County, Alabama ; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 4/22/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Jackson v. Circuit Courts of Houston County et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 7 THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION LOUIS FRANK JACKSON, II, #64004 Plaintiff, v. CIRCUIT COURTS OF HOUSTON COUNTY, et al. , Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-CV-231-ID WO FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings, opinions, and orders of the Court, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court that this case be dismissed with prejudice as to the claims against the defendants, and without prejudice as to Plaintiff’s ability to challenge the constitutionality of the sentence imposed upon him by the Circuit Court for Houston County, Alabama. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this 22nd day of April, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.