Flournoy v. Duffie et al (INMATE 2), No. 1:2010cv00104 - Document 54 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf Donnell Flournoy's 51 Objections are overruled; (2) The US Magistrate Judge's 46 Recommendation is adopted; (3) Dfts Skip Duffie, Gary Knight, and Veronica Alvardo's 18 & 24 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted; (4) Judgment is entered in favor of dfts Duffie, Knight, and Alvardo and against plf Flournoy, with plf Flournoy taking nothing by his complaint; further ORDERED that plf Flournoy& #039;s 49 Motion for Reconsideration is denied; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf Flournoy, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/3/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Flournoy v. Duffie et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 54 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION DONNELL FLOURNOY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. SKIP DUFFIE, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv104-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff Donnell Flournoy’s objections (doc. no. 51) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (Doc. No. 46) is adopted. (3) Defendants Skip Duffie, Gary Knight, and Veronica Alvardo’s motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 18 & 24) are granted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Duffie, Judgment is Knight, and entered Alvardo in favor and of against defendants plaintiff Flournoy, with plaintiff Flournoy taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Flournoy’s motion for reconsideration (doc. no. 49) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Flournoy, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 3rd day of October, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
