Copley v. Superior Logistics Alternative, Inc., No. 1:2010cv00009 - Document 23 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with this Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) judgment is entered against def Superior Logistics Alternative, Inc. and in favor of plf Sandra Copley, in the amount of  6;208,343.10, consisting of back pay in the amount of $8,343.10, compensatory damages in the amount of $75,000, and punitive damages in the amount of $125,000; (2) further ORDERED that costs are hereby TAXED against def and in favor of plf, for which execution may issue; (3) directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rules 55(b) and 58 of the FRCP and close this file. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/30/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Copley v. Superior Logistics Alternative, Inc. Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION SANDRA COPELY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR LOGISTICS ALTERNATIVE, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-0009-MEF FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with this Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion for a Default Judgment, (Doc. # 11), and upon consideration of the testimony and evidence presented at the August 18, 2010 hearing on damages and the record as a whole it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1) Judgment is ENTERED against Defendant Superior Logistics Alternative, Inc. and in favor of Plaintiff Sandra Copely, in the amount of $208,343.10, consisting of back pay in the amount of $8,343.10, compensatory damages in the amount of $75,000, and punitive damages in the amount of $125,000. 2) It is further ORDERED that costs are hereby TAXED against Defendant and in favor of Plaintiff, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com 3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rules 55(b) and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and close this file. th DONE this the 30 day of March, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.