Davis v. United Parcel Service, No. 1:2009cv00812 - Document 55 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT; that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and with leave to the parties, within 49 days, to stipulate to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to theentry of judgment i nstead of dismissal as further set out; that all outstanding motions are denied as moot; that the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 9/29/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, ) Jury Selection 10/18/2010 TERMINATED; Jury Trial 10/18/2010 TERMINATED

Download PDF
Davis v. United Parcel Service Doc. 55 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION CLARENCE W. DAVIS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv812-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT The court having been informed that this cause is now settled, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs and with leave to the parties, within 49 days, to stipulate to a different basis for dismissal or to stipulate to the entry of judgment instead of dismissal, and with leave to any party to file, within 49 days, a motion to have the dismissal set settlement aside enforced, and the should case the reinstated settlement or the not be consummated. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that all outstanding motions are denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 29th day of September, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.