McNeal v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 1), No. 1:2009cv00641 - Document 17 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 14 RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The plaintiff's claims against the Houston County Jail are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the d irectives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(3)(2)(B)(I). 2. The Houston County Jail is DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action. 3. This case, with respect to the plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants regarding the conditions of confinement at the Houston County Jail is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/18/2009. (dmn)

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTONIO MCNEAL, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09cv641-TMH ORDER AND OPINION On August 17, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 14). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The plaintiff s claims against the Houston County Jail are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(3)(2)(B)(I). 2. The Houston County Jail is DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action. 3. This case, with respect to the plaintiff s claims against the remaining defendants regarding the conditions of confinement at the Houston County Jail is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Done this the 18 th day of September, 2009. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs ________________________________________ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.