Robinson v. Deloach et al (INMATE 1), No. 1:2006cv01061 - Document 48 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's 46 Objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 45 Recommendation is adopted. (3) The 1 petition for writ of habeas co rpus is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/24/2009. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Appeals Checklist) (dmn)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Robinson v. Deloach et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 48 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES L. ROBINSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) WARDEN JAMES DELOACH and ) ATTORNEY GENERAL TROY KING, ) ) Respondents. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv1061-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 46) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 45) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 24th day of April, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
