Holloman v. Allen et al (INMATE 2), No. 1:2006cv00786 - Document 20 (M.D. Ala. 2009)
Court Description: JUDGMENT as follows: (1) The 18 Petitioner's Objections are overruled; (2) The 17 United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is adopted; and (3) The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 10/19/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Holloman v. Allen et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 20 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES HICKMAN HOLLOMAN, Petitioner, v. RICHARD ALLEN, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv786-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 18) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 17) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 19th day of October, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
