Cutts v. Jones et al (INMATE1), No. 1:2006cv00256 - Document 28 (M.D. Ala. 2009)

Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) petitioner's 25 objections are overruled; (2) ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge; (3) the petition for writ of h abeas corpus 1 is denied as time-barred; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against the petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 1/30/09. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Cutts v. Jones et al (INMATE1) Doc. 28 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION RUSSELL WILLIAM CUTTS, JR., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) KENNETH JONES, Warden, and ) TROY KING, Attorney General ) of the State of Alabama, ) ) Respondents. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv256-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 25) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied as time-barred. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against Dockets.Justia.com petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 30th day of January, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.