Taylor v. ROSE FURNITURE CO., 341 F. Supp. 2d 576 (M.D.N.C. 2004)

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina - 341 F. Supp. 2d 576 (M.D.N.C. 2004)
October 26, 2004

341 F. Supp. 2d 576 (2004)

Rose Mary TAYLOR, Plaintiff,
v.
ROSE FURNITURE COMPANY; William V. Kester; and Robert L. Kester, Defendants.

No. 1:04 CV 00450.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina.

October 26, 2004.

Julie H. Fosbinder, Joshua R. Van Kampen, Charlotte, NC, for Plaintiff.

Wade E. Ballard, Edwards Ballard Bishop Sturm Clark & Keim, P.A., Spartanburg, SC, for Defendants.

 
ORDER

BULLOCK, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously herewith,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss Plaintiff's first cause of action against all Defendants entitled "Discrimination in Violation of Public Policy" is GRANTED; Defendants' motion [Doc. # 7] to dismiss Plaintiff's second cause of action under the FMLA against the individual Defendants is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion [Doc. # 11] for a default judgment against Defendant Rose Furniture Company on Plaintiff's claim under the FMLA is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for attorney's fees and costs is DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.