Sebring Pottery Co. v. Steubenville Pottery Co., 9 F. Supp. 384 (N.D. Ohio 1934)

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio - 9 F. Supp. 384 (N.D. Ohio 1934)
December 11, 1934

9 F. Supp. 384 (1934)

SEBRING POTTERY CO.
v.
STEUBENVILLE POTTERY CO. et al.

No. 3955.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

December 11, 1934.

*385 *386 *387 *388 *389 *390 Byrnes, Stebbins & Blenko, of Pittsburgh, Pa., Tolles, Hogsett & Ginn, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

*391 Smith, Francis & Irvine, of Steubenville, Ohio, and Fay, Oberlin & Fay, of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

JONES, District Judge.

Upon due consideration, the exceptions to the report of the special master in respect of accounting, award of damages, and counsel fees will be overruled, except as to the allowance of counsel fees. The recommended allowance for a case of the proportions of this one seems to me to be in excess of an amount which a court might reasonably allow. To avoid any question of irregularity in respect of the master's consideration and recommendation of counsel fees, it is the independent judgment of this court that the sum of $1,800 represents a reasonable attorney's fee to be allowed the plaintiff.

Report of master in other respects approved and confirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.