Miano v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., 834 F. Supp. 632 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- 834 F. Supp. 632 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)
August 19, 1993
834 F. Supp. 632 (1993)
Louis MIANO, Plaintiff,
v.
AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
Michael R. WIDENER, Plaintiff,
v.
AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
Morton WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff,
v.
AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
Nos. 91 Civ. 1280 (LBS), 91 Civ. 1676 (LBS) and 91 Civ. 3906 (LBS).
August 19, 1993.
ENDORSEMENT
August 19, 1993
v.
AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
Michael R. WIDENER, Plaintiff,
v.
AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
Morton WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff,
v.
AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
ENDORSEMENT
SAND, District Judge.
The Orders of Magistrate Judge Katz of Feb. 25, 1993, 148 F.R.D. 68, and of May 6, 1993 are adopted and approved.
*633 The Court finds no error in Judge Katz's thoughtful and thorough opinion and ruling.
So Ordered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
