Campbell v. Montana State Bd. of Pardons, 470 F. Supp. 1301 (D. Mont. 1979)
June 25, 1979
v.
MONTANA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS, Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division.
*1302 Patrick James Campbell, pro se.
Mike Greely, Atty. Gen., State of Montana, Helena, Mont., for defendant.
OPINION AND ORDER
RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.
The petition for leave to appear in forma pauperis is denied on the ground that the petition is frivolous. In Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex, ___ U.S. ___, 99 S. Ct. 2100, 60 L. Ed. 2d 668 (1979), the Supreme Court held that, unless a parole statute creates a legitimate entitlement to parole, there is no requirement of due process protection. A mere hope is insufficient. The language of the Montana statute[1] does not in my opinion create an entitlement. Whether or not parole is granted is dependent entirely on the discretion of the parole board.
NOTES[1] "Subject to the following restrictions, the board shall release on parole by appropriate order any person confined in the Montana state prison, except persons under sentence of death and persons serving sentences imposed under XX-XX-XXX(2), when in its opinion there is reasonable probability that the prisoner can be released without detriment to himself or to the community." Mont. Code Ann. ยง 46-23-201(1) (1978).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.