C-Tc 9th Avenue Partnership v. Norton Company, 196 B.R. 666 (N.D.N.Y 1996)

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York - 196 B.R. 666 (N.D.N.Y 1996)
May 17, 1996

196 B.R. 666 (1996)

C-TC 9TH AVENUE PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff,
v.
NORTON COMPANY, Defendant.

No. 95-CV-1130.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

May 17, 1996.

Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman, LLP, East Meadow, New York (Michael D. Brofman, of counsel), for Plaintiff.

DeGraff, Foy, Holt-Harris, Mealey & Kunz, LLP, Albany, New York (Robert J. Rock, of counsel), for Defendant.

Arnis Zilgme, Town Attorney, Newtonville, New York (William Nowak, of counsel), for Creditor Town of Colonie.

Cusick, Hacker & Murphy, Latham, New York (David R. Murphy, of counsel), for Creditor Maplewood School District.

 
ORDER

CHOLAKIS, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is an appeal of the Memorandum-Decision and Order of Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Littlefield, Jr., dated June 28, 1995, wherein he dismissed the case of debtor C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership. This Court hereby AFFIRMS for substantially the reasons set forth in Bankruptcy Judge Littlefield's thorough decision regarding the ineligibility of a dissolved partnership to proceed under Chapter 11. In re C-TC 9th Avenue Partnership, 193 B.R. 650 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1995). Accordingly, that further portion of the decision, based upon a determination that this case was not filed in good faith, need not be considered by this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.