Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United States, No. 99-08 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2002)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on March 22, 2000.
Download PDF
Slip Op. 02-35 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE _______________________________________________ BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, U.S. STEEL GROUP, A UNIT OF USX CORPORATION, ISPAT INLAND INC., LTV STEEL COMPANY, INC. and NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. : : : : : UNITED STATES, : Defendant, and Court No. 99-08-00524 : : USINAS SIDERÃ RGICAS DE MINAS GERAIS S/A, COMPANHIA SIDERÃ RGICA PAULISTA and COMPANHIA SIDERÃ RGICA NACIONAL, : : Defendant-Intervenors. _______________________________________________ : JUDGMENT Plaintiffs having filed a Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record challenging the determination of the U.S. Department of Commerce ( Commerce ) suspending an investigation into the alleged dumping in the United States of certain steel products from Brazil, published at Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation, Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products from Brazil, 64 Fed. Reg. 38,792 (July 19, 1999); and further The Court having granted Plaintiffs motion in part in Slip Op. 01-65, 25 CIT ___, 146 F. Supp. 2d 927 (2001), and, pursuant thereto, having remanded the matter to Commerce; and further The Court having stayed its remand order at Defendant s request, and with the consent of all parties, pending the outcome of the then-ongoing administrative review of the suspension agreement at issue; and further Court No. 99-08-00524 Page 2 Commerce now having published the final results of the administrative review terminating the suspension agreement, at Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Termination of the Suspension Agreement, Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon Quality Steel Products From Brazil, 67 Fed. Reg. 6226 (Feb. 11, 2002); and further The 30-day period for appeal of the termination of the suspension agreement having expired, with no appeal taken, so that the suspension agreement which was the subject of this action no longer has legal force or effect; and further Plaintiffs having filed a Stipulation of Dismissal under U.S. CIT Rule 41(a)(1)(B), signed by all parties to the action; Now, therefore, after due deliberation, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this case be, and it hereby is, dismissed. ___________________________________ Delissa A. Ridgway Judge Dated: April 2, 2002 New York, New York
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
