POLYCOM, INC. v. DIRECTPACKET RESEARCH, INC. , No. 21-1744 (Fed. Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 21-1744 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 12/13/2021 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ POLYCOM, INC., Appellant v. DIRECTPACKET RESEARCH, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2021-1744 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201901234. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GEOFFREY P. EATON, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID DALKE, Los Angeles, CA; NOOROSSADAT TORABI, San Francisco, CA; KATHERINE VIDAL, Redwood City, CA. TERENCE P. ROSS, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER FERENC, ERIC THOMAS WERLINGER. ______________________ Case: 21-1744 Document: 35 Page: 2 Filed: 12/13/2021 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, DYK and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 13, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.