NEURELIS, INC. v. AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC. , No. 21-1038 (Fed. Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 21-1038 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 10/07/2021 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NEURELIS, INC., Appellant v. AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2021-1038 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201900451. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WENDY L. DEVINE, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by RICHARD TORCZON, Washington, DC; LORELEI WESTIN, San Diego, CA; JEFFREY WILLIAM GUISE, Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, San Diego, CA. DANIEL A. SCOLA, JR., Hoffmann & Baron, LLP, Parsippany, NJ, argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL I. CHAKANSKY; JOHN T. GALLAGHER, Syosset, NY. ______________________ Case: 21-1038 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 10/07/2021 THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 7, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.