INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. , No. 20-1077 (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 20-1077 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 09/03/2020 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS CORPORATION, DBA ID TECH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2020-1077 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:17-cv-01748-DOCJDE, Judge David O. Carter. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOHN D. HAYNES, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by PATRICK FLINN, HOLLY HAWKINS SAPORITO; JAMES ABE, Los Angeles, CA; DANIEL L. HUYNH, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP, Atlanta, GA. RUFFIN B. CORDELL, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also Case: 20-1077 Document: 59 Page: 2 Filed: 09/03/2020 represented by CHRISTOPHER DRYER, MICHAEL J. MCKEON, MATTHEW MOSTELLER; FRANCIS J. ALBERT, San Diego, CA; CHRISTOPHER WOOD KENNERLY, Paul Hastings LLP, Palo Alto, CA; ELIZABETH BRANN, San Diego, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 3, 2020 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.