DEXCOM, INC. v. WAVEFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , No. 18-1752 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DEXCOM, INC., Appellant v. WAVEFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2018-1752, 2018-1753 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR201601679, IPR2016-01680. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID B. COCHRAN, CALVIN GRIFFITH, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA; SCOTT E. DAVIS, JOHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR. SCOTT D. EADS, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by NICHOLAS (NIKA) FREMONT ALDRICH, JR., SARA KOBAK, JASON ADAM WRUBLESKI. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 3, 2019 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.