POWER ANALYTICS CORPORATION v. OPERATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. , No. 18-1428 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ POWER ANALYTICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. OPERATION TECHNOLOGY INC, DBA ETAP, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees OSISOFT, LLC, Defendant ______________________ 2018-1428 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:16-cv-01955-JAKFFM, Judge John A. Kronstadt. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROBERT F. R UYAK, RuyakCherian LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by AMADOU KILKENNY DIAW; K ORULA T. CHERIAN, Berkeley, CA; JERROLD GANZFRIED, Ganzfried Law, Washington, DC. JOHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendant-appellee Operation Technology, Inc. also represented by SARAH ELISABETH JELSEMA, SALUMEH R. LOESCH . REGINALD J. HILL, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee Schneider Electric USA, Inc. Also represented by BENJAMIN J. BRADFORD, LISA MARIE SCHOEDEL; A DAM G. UNIKOWSKY, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER C URIAM (DYK, WALLACH , and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE C OURT January 15, 2019 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.