MANTIS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS, LLC , No. 18-1332 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MANTIS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS, LLC, EDIBLE ARRANGEMENTS INTERNATIONAL LLC, CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC., REGAL CINEMAS, INC, REGAL CINEMEDIA CORPORATION, REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC, BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING, LLC, BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISED SHOPS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees PAPA MURPHY'S HOLDINGS, INC, PAPA MURPHY'S INTERNATIONAL, LLC, MURPHY'S MARKETING SERVICES, INC, PAPA MURPHY'S COMPANY STORES, INC, Defendants ______________________ 2018-1332, 2018-1334, 2018-1337, 2018-1339, 2018-1340 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:17-cv-00324-JRG-RSP, 2:17-cv-00325-JRG-RSP, 2:17-cv-00327-JRG-RSP, 2:17-cv00328-JRG-RSP, 2:17-cv-00339-JRG-RSP, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ TARA KLAMROWSKI, Alan Sege, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by RYAN E. HATCH, Law Office of Ryan E. Hatch, PC, Los Angeles, CA. DAVID BRANDON CONRAD, Fish & Richardson PC, Dallas, TX, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Culver Franchising System, Inc., Regal Cinemas, Inc, Regal CineMedia Corporation, Regal Entertainment Group, Inc, Baskin-Robbins Franchising, LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC also represented by RICARDO BONILLA, THERESA DAWSON, NEIL J. MCNABNAY. MICHAEL A. BITTNER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Dallas, TX, for defendants-appellees Edible Arrangements, LLC, Edible Arrangements International LLC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 9, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.