PROCOPIO v. WILKIE , No. 17-1821 (Fed. Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on August 20, 2018.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on January 29, 2019.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ALFRED PROCOPIO, JR., Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2017-1821 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 15-4082, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch. ______________________ SUA SPONTE HEARING EN BANC ______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges. ∗ PER CURIAM. ∗ Circuit Judge Hughes did not participate. 2 PROCOPIO v. WILKIE ORDER This case was argued before a panel of three judges on May 4, 2018. The panel sua sponte requested a poll on whether to consider this case en banc. A poll was conducted, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service voted for en banc consideration. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The court sua sponte orders that this case be heard en banc under 28 U.S.C. § 46 and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a). The en banc court shall consist of all circuit judges in regular active service who are not recused or disqualified. (2) The parties are requested to file new briefs. The briefs should address the following issues: a. Does the phrase “served in the Republic of Vietnam” in 38 U.S.C. § 1116 unambiguously include service in offshore waters within the legally recognized territorial limits of the Republic of Vietnam, regardless of whether such service included presence on or within the landmass of the Republic of Vietnam? i. What role, if any, does the proclaimant canon play in this analysis? (3) The en banc briefs and briefs of any amici curiae shall be electronically filed in the ECF system, and thirty paper copies of each brief and any appendix shall be filed with the court. Two paper copies of all filings shall be served on opposing counsel. (4) Mr. Procopio’s en banc brief is due 45 days from the date of this order. Any amicus brief supporting Mr. Procopio’s position or supporting neither position is due within 10 days thereafter. The Secretary’s re- PROCOPIO v. WILKIE 3 sponse brief is due within 30 days of service of Mr. Procopio’s en banc brief. Any amicus brief supporting the Secretary’s position is due within 10 days thereafter. Mr. Procopio’s reply brief is due within 15 days of service of the Secretary’s response brief. Briefs shall adhere to the type-volume limitations set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32 and Federal Circuit Rule 32. (5) Briefing should be limited to the issues set forth above. (6) The court invites the views of amici curiae. Any such amicus briefs may be filed without consent and leave of court, but otherwise must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 and Federal Circuit Rule 29. All amicus briefs shall be filed as stated above. (7) This appeal will be heard en banc on the basis of the new briefing ordered herein and oral argument. (8) Oral argument will be scheduled at a later date. FOR THE COURT August 16, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
