GOLD CHARM LIMITED v. SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD. , No. 17-1738 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GOLD CHARM LIMITED, Appellant v. SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD., FUNAI ELECTRIC CO., LTD., TOSHIBA CORP., Appellees ______________________ 2017-1738 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201501417. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ FREDERICK A. TECCE, Ice Miller LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by AARON ROBERT ETTELMAN; MICHAEL JAMES HOPKINS, Chicago, IL; STEPHEN EMERSON MURRAY, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP, Philadelphia, PA. ROBERT T. HASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for all appellees. Appellee Samsung Display Co., Ltd also represented by JAY I. ALEXANDER, JEFFREY HOWARD LERNER, Washington, DC. MARC ROBERT LABGOLD, Marc R. Labgold, P.C., Reston, VA, for appellee Funai Electric Co., Ltd. Also represented by PATRICK J. HOEFFNER. PAUL MEIKLEJOHN, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Seattle, WA, for appellee Toshiba Corp. Also represented by CLINTON CONNER, Minneapolis, MN; ADAM VINCENT FLOYD, Denver, CO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 4, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.