QUEST LICENSING CORPORATION v. BLOOMBERG LP [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] 6-7-2018, No. 17-1561 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ QUEST LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. BLOOMBERG LP, BLOOMBERG FINANCE LP, INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION, THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, CHARLES SCHWAB & CO. INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2017-1561 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:14-cv-00561-GMS, 1:14-cv00562-GMS, 1:14-cv-00563-GMS, 1:14-cv-00564-GMS, 1:14-cv-00727-GMS, Judge Gregory M. Sleet. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ALFRED ROSS FABRICANT, Brown Rudnick, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by LAWRENCE C. DRUCKER, PETER LAMBRIANAKOS, VINCENT J. RUBINO, III. EDWARD POPLAWSKI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, argued for all defendantsappellees. Defendants-appellees Bloomberg LP, Bloomberg Finance LP, The Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. also represented by OLIVIA M. KIM; MICHAEL BRETT LEVIN, Palo Alto, CA; ADAM WILLIAM BURROWBRIDGE, Washington, DC. ROBERT MALLIN, Brinks Gilson & Lione, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee Interactive Data Corporation. Also represented by JAFON FEARSON, JAMES ROBERT SOBIERAJ. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 8, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.