NEOLOGY, INC. v. KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM IVHS INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] 6-4-2018, No. 17-1228 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NEOLOGY, INC., Appellant v. KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM IVHS INC., KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM HOLDING CORP., Appellees ______________________ 2017-1228, 2017-1229 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-00818, IPR2015-00819. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROBERT H. SLOSS, Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by VICTOR FELIX, San Diego, CA. NATHAN S. MAMMEN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by GREGG F. LOCASCIO. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 6, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.