IN RE: RADCLIFFE , No. 17-1069 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: WILLIAM H. RADCLIFFE, Appellant ______________________ 2017-1069 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/804,454. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MATHEW PERRONE, JR., Law Office of Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr., Algonquin, IL, argued for appellant. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JEREMIAH HELM. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 8, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.