MACIAS v. ARMY [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] , No. 16-2508 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MICHAEL L. MACIAS, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent ______________________ 2016-2508 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0752-15-0385-I-2. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DAVID PAUL CLISHAM, Clisham & Sortor, San Francisco, CA, argued for petitioner. Also represented by JUSTINE LIV CLISHAM. RETA EMMA BEZAK, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by REGINALD T. BLADES, JR., ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., CHAD A. READLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 24, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.