SPECK v. BATES , No. 16-1879 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ULRICH SPECK, Appellant v. BRIAN L. BATES, ANTHONY O. RAGHEB, JOSEPH M. STEWART, IV, WILLIAM J. BOURDEAU, BRIAN D. CHOULES, JAMES D. PURDY, NEAL E. FEARNOT, Appellees ______________________ 2016-1879 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 106,044. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ BRYAN PATRICK COLLINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JACK S. BARUFKA, ROBERT M. FUHRER. CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN, Woodard, Emhardt, Moriarty, McNett & Henry LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellees. Also represented by WILLIAM ALEX MCKENNA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 13, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.