CALLWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LLC v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC , No. 16-1684 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CALLWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, GOOGLE INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA VERIZON WIRELESS, T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendants-Appellees BLACKBERRY LIMITED, BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, Defendants ______________________ 2016-1684, 2016-1685, 2016-1686, 2016-1687, 2016-1688 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:12-cv-01701-RGA, 1:12-cv01702-RGA, 1:12-cv-01703-RGA, 1:12-cv-01704-RGA, 1:12-cv-01788-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GREGORY SCOTT BISHOP, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also repre- sented by CHARLES FOSTER KOCH; WILLIAM D. BELANGER, LEINWEIH ANDREW TSENG, Boston, MA. DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Google Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., also represented by RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM, Seattle, WA; VICTORIA Q. SMITH, Palo Alto, CA. JOSEPH P. ZAMMIT, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, New York, NY, for defendant-appellee AT&T Mobility LLC. Also represented by JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Washington, DC; DANIEL LEVENTHAL, BRETT ASHLEY MCKEAN, Houston, TX. KEVIN PAUL ANDERSON, Wiley Rein, LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Verizon Services Corp., Cellco Parnership, dba Verizon Wireless. Also represented by KARIN A. HESSLER, ROBERT JAMES SCHEFFEL. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 10, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.