MONEYCAT LTD. v. EBAY INC. , No. 16-1399 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MONEYCAT LTD., Appellant v. EBAY INC., Appellee ______________________ 2016-1399, 2016-1405, 2016-1408 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. CBM2014-00091, CBM2014-00092, CBM2014-00093. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ HOWARD N. WISNIA, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., San Diego, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SANDRA BADIN, Boston, MA; BRAD M. SCHELLER, New York, NY. JARED BOBROW, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN CHANG; SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN, Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 18, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.