CAPITAL DYNAMICS v. CAMBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC , No. 16-1318 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAPITAL DYNAMICS, Appellant v. CAMBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2016-1318 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM201400079. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ EDMOND R. BANNON, Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by JONATHAN A. MARSHALL. DALILA ARGAEZ WENDLANDT, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JON STEVEN BAUGHMAN, JORDAN ROSSEN, DARRELL STARK, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 9, 2016 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.