WATERS TECHNOLOGIES v. AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES , No. 15-1281 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WATERS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Appellant v. AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., (AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO AURORA SFC SYSTEMS, INC.), Appellee ______________________ 2015-1281 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,910. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DEBORAH M. VERNON, McCarter & English, LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by KIA LYNN FREEMAN, ERIK PAUL BELT. JOHN M. GRIEM, JR., Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 11, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.