PAPST LICENSING v. FUJIFILM CORPORATION , No. 14-1110 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 2, 2015.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ March 9, 2015 ERRATA ______________________ Appeal No. 2014-1110 IN RE PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA PATENT LITIGATION ____________________________________________________ PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, v. FUJIFILM CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION (formerly known as Fujifilm USA, Inc.), HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON, INC., OLYMPUS CORP., OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION (formerly known as Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD.), PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD., Decided: February 2, 2015 Precedential Opinion _____________________ 2 PAPST LICENSING V. FUJIFILM CORPORATION Please make the following change: On page nine, first paragraph, replace the sentence Second, it is undisputed that if we reject all five of the challenged constructions, the summary-judgment orders must be vacated.2 with the following sentence: Second, it is appropriate, if we reject all five of the challenged constructions, to vacate the summaryjudgment orders and remand.2 Footnote 2 remains unchanged.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
