HITACHI CONSUMER ELECTRONICS v. TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS , No. 14-1047 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 14-1047 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 12/12/2013 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HITACHI CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND HITACHI ADVANCED DIGITAL, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO., LTD., TPV INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC., ENVISION PERIPHERALS, INC., TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TPV ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD. AND TPV TECHNOLOGY LTD., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2014-1047 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:10-cv-00260-JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap. -------------------------------------HITACHI CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND HITACHI ADVANCED DIGITAL, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Case: 14-1047 2 ELECTRONICS Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 12/12/2013 HITACHI CONSUMER ELECTRONICS v. TOP VICTORY TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO., LTD., TPV INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC., ENVISION PERIPHERALS, INC., TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TPV ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD. AND TPV TECHNOLOGY LTD., Defendants-Appellants. ______________________ 2014-1095 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:10-cv-00260-JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER Upon consideration of Top Victory Electronics Co. et al. s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal no. 2014-1095, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. Appeal no. 2014-1095 is dismissed. (2) The revised official caption is reflected above. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2014-1095. FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court Case: 14-1047 Document: 19 HITACHI CONSUMER ELECTRONICS ELECTRONICS Page: 3 Filed: 12/12/2013 v. TOP VICTORY 3 s26 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2014-1095 only): December 12, 2013

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.