BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG v. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC , No. 14-1032 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG AND BAYER S.A.S., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2014-1032 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00256-RMB-JS, Judge Renee Marie Bumb. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CHRISTOPHER J. GASPAR, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT J. KOCH, STEPHANIE R. AMOROSO, EDWARD J. MAYLE and RONALD L. SIGWORTH, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief were BRADFORD J. BADKE and SONA DE, Ropes & Gray LLP, of New York, New York. MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were SUSANNAH LANDES WEAVER; and PETER A. BICKS, ALEX V. CHACHKES and ANDREW D. SILVERMAN, of New York, New York. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 17, 2014 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
