ZABLOSKY v. MIDFIRST BANK , No. 13-1626 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 13-1626 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2013 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JAMES E. ZABLOSKY AND KAREN ZABLOSKY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MIDFIRST BANK AND MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO., Defendants-Appellees, AND SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2013-1626 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 13-CV-0467, Senior Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth. ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER The court considers whether this appeal should be dismissed. Case: 13-1626 Document: 15 2 Page: 2 ZABLOSKY Filed: 11/25/2013 v. MIDFIRST BANK This appeal involves an action by James and Karen Zablosky to halt foreclosure on property located at 187 Country View Lane, Floresville, Texas. The Zabloskys appeal. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction, which does not appear to include jurisdiction in this matter. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1295. Rather, it appears the proper forum would be the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Additionally, on September 3, 2013, the Zabloskys filed with the district court a motion to withdraw their appeal, and thus it may be that it would be unnecessary to transfer this appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Absent objection received within 21 days of the date of this order, this appeal will be dismissed. (2) The briefing schedule is stayed. FOR THE COURT s25 /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.