APELDYN CORP. V. AU OPTRONICS CORP. , No. 12-1172 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wniteb ~tate~ <!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. 2012-1172 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson. 2 APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS ON MOTION ORDER AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America move without opposition for an extension of time until December 5, 2012, to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT OCT 19 2012 Date cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq. Donald R. McPhail, Esq. Terrence D. Garnett, Esq. s24 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED u.s.THE FEDEfl~l CIRCUITFOn COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 ZU'IL JANHORBAlY a.ERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.