CONVOLVE v. COMPAQ , No. 12-1074 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on July 1, 2013.

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ July 2, 2013 ERRATA ______________________ Appeal No. 2012-1074 CONVOLVE, INC. AND MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Paintiffs-Appellants, v. COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Decided: July 1, 2013 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following change: Page 2, changes CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON. Of counsel was VINCENT BUCCOLA, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois; CARTER G. PHILLIPS and ROBERT N. HOCHMAN, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC; NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC. to CHRISTOPHER D. LANDGRAFF, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Compaq Computer Corporation. With him on the brief was MARK E. FERGUSON. CARTER G. PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Seagate Technology, LLC, et al. With him on the brief was ROBERT N. HOCHMAN. Of counsel on the brief were NATALIA V. BLINKOVA and BLAIR M. JACOBS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, of Washington, DC.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.