IN RE CARNAHAN, No. 11-1324 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE EDMUND M. CARNAHAN, DAVID D. DEVORE, GREGORY M. GODZIELA, PAUL C. VOSEJPKA, BURKHARD E. WAGNER, AND JOSEPH N. COALTER, III ____________________ 2011-1324 (Serial No. 11/632,371) ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ RAY ASHBURG, The Dow Chemical Company Intellectual Property Law, of Freeport, Texas, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JAMES T. HOPPE and JENNIFER A. CARNAHAN. FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 9, 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.