IN RE FISCH, No. 11-1068 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE HARRY FISCH ______________________ 2011-1068 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 90/008,024. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WILLIAM F. SMITH, Woodcock Washburn, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was JOHN F. MURPHY. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor Associate, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 12, 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.