POLLOCK V USPS, No. 09-3143 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3143 ROBERT L. POLLOCK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. Philip C. Kimball, Attorney at Law, of Louisville, Kentucky, argued for petitioner. Kenneth D. Woodrow, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Donald E. Kinner, Assistant Director. Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3143 ROBERT L. POLLOCK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. Judgment ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board in CASE NO(S). CH0752080578-I-1 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED December 23, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.