IN RE RACKMAN, No. 09-1217 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1217 (Reexamination No. 90/007,353) IN RE MICHAEL I. RACKMAN Michael I. Rackman, Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, P.C., of New York, New York, argued for appellant. Sydney O. Johnson, Jr., Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and Thomas L. Stoll, Associate Solicitor. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1217 (Reexamination No. 90/007,353) IN RE MICHAEL I. RACKMAN Judgment ON APEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in CASE NO(S). 90/007, 353 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (BRYSON, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.) AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: November 4, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.